After the Arab Spring: The Islamists’ Compromise in Tunisia

Issue Date October 2015
Volume 26
Issue 4
Page Numbers 110-124
file Print
arrow-down-thin Download from Project MUSE
external View Citation

Read the full essay here.

By voting for the Tunisia’s new constitution in January 2014, the Islamist party Nahda accepted many principles that were in contradiction with Islamist ideology. Most importantly, the party accepted the principle of freedom of consciousness and the absence of a reference to Sharia. This paper argues that, contrary to many theories in the field, the Islamists conceded solely out of necessity. However, after the concessions the leadership of the party uncovered new interpretations of Islam and Islamism in order to persuade the party members to support the constitution. This way, the Islamists unwillingly brought about a secularization of the political sphere in Tunisia.

About the Author

Kasper Ly Netterstrøm is a doctoral candidate at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy. He has lived in Tunisia and has made several extensive visits there since the revolution in 2011.

View all work by Kasper Ly Netterstrøm